Ted Naleid

Over on the RailsEnvy blog (the guys who made the “Rails vs. X commercials” last year), there’s an article that highlights some of the nice syntactic sugar that Groovy has that’s currently not available in Ruby.

I actually came to Groovy/Grails after working with Ruby/Rails for about a year. Both languages and framworks have their strengths and it’s nice to see cross-pollination of good ideas going both ways. From the comments, it sounds like Ruby 1.9 is getting some of the features that we’ve had in Groovy for a while.
Read the rest of this article »

UPDATE: if you’re using Groovy 1.6.1 or greater (released April 2009), check out the new find and find all methods in this post.

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think “I know, I’ll use regular expressions!”
Now they have two problems. — Jaime Zawinski

There is a common and well-earned aversion in the Java world to regular expressions. Prior to Java 1.4, regular expressions weren’t even part of the core language. Post 1.4, using regular expressions is still a painful task of working with Pattern and Matcher objects. Lots of typing is involved to make anything happen. It’s difficult enough that most Java devs don’t end up using them enough to actually remember how to read a regular expression, and they need to dig up the JavaDocs (or cut and paste an old example), every time they want to use them.

This aversion has persisted into the Groovy community to a level that I haven’t seen in other dynamic scripting languages like Ruby, Python, and (obviously) Perl.

The current regexp docs that pop up when doing a google search are all outdated and don’t use any of the best techniques that are available in the groovy 1.5.X and 1.6-beta code that is now available. The recent Groovy Recipes book doesn’t have an entry for regular expressions in the index, and I was unable to find a single example of a regular expression in the entire book.

This is unfortunate because Groovy makes using regular expressions much easier than in Java. Under the covers, you’re still working with the same old Java Pattern and Matcher objects, but the Groovy syntax and additions to those classes are pleasant to work with.
Read the rest of this article »

As my coworkers know, I’m a keyboard shortcut junkie. It’s a problem (and I need help), but I’d rather give you a taste of what I’ve been smoking and drag you down with me :).

Why only 3? Because people don’t learn a couple of pages of keystroke combinations at a time. But with only the 3 of the best keystrokes, there’s a good chance I’ll get you hooked and you’ll seek out some more.
Read the rest of this article »

If you’ve ever wondered what methods a groovy class has available for you to call, all you need to do is ask the metaClass:

"foo".metaClass.methods*.name

Result:

["equals", "getClass", "hashCode", "notify", "notifyAll", "toString", "wait", "wait", 
"wait", "charAt", "codePointAt", "codePointBefore", "codePointCount", "compareTo", 
"compareTo", "compareToIgnoreCase", "concat", "contains", "contentEquals", 
"contentEquals", "copyValueOf", "copyValueOf", "endsWith", "equals", 
"equalsIgnoreCase", "format", "format", "getBytes", "getBytes",
 "getBytes", "getChars", "hashCode", "indexOf", "indexOf", "indexOf", 
"indexOf", "intern", "lastIndexOf", "lastIndexOf", "lastIndexOf", "lastIndexOf", 
"length", "matches", "offsetByCodePoints", "regionMatches", "regionMatches", 
"replace", "replace", "replaceAll", "replaceFirst", "split", "split", "startsWith",
 "startsWith", "subSequence", "substring", "substring", "toCharArray", 
"toLowerCase", "toLowerCase", "toString", "toUpperCase", "toUpperCase", 
"trim", "valueOf", "valueOf", "valueOf", "valueOf", "valueOf", "valueOf", 
"valueOf", "valueOf", "valueOf"]

There’s a lot of duplication in there, and the order is random, so I’ll often fix that like this:

"foo".metaClass.methods*.name.sort().unique()

Result:

["charAt", "codePointAt", "codePointBefore", "codePointCount", "compareTo",
 "compareToIgnoreCase", "concat", "contains", "contentEquals", "copyValueOf", 
"endsWith", "equals", "equalsIgnoreCase", "format", "getBytes", "getChars",
 "getClass", "hashCode", "indexOf", "intern", "lastIndexOf", "length", "matches", 
"notify", "notifyAll", "offsetByCodePoints", "regionMatches", "replace", "replaceAll",
 "replaceFirst", "split", "startsWith", "subSequence", "substring", "toCharArray", 
"toLowerCase", "toString", "toUpperCase", "trim", "valueOf", "wait"]

Read the rest of this article »

There’s a blog post by one of the subversion developers talking about the future of subversion in a DVCS world.

I agree with parts of the post (and many of the comments) that subversion will continue to be around for a long time, but that more and more developers will start using tools like mercurial and git as a “super client” for a normal centralized version control repository.

Read the rest of this article »